Connatser Family Law Faces Criticism From Former Clients and Employees

Connatser Family Law, a firm specializing in divorce and family law matters, has come under increased scrutiny following a series of critical reviews and allegations raised by former clients and individuals identifying themselves as former employees.

The firm, led by attorney Aubrey Connatser, represents clients in divorce proceedings, including cases involving significant assets. While Connatser Family Law maintains an active presence in the family law space, a review of publicly available online feedback reveals recurring concerns related to billing practices, litigation strategy, and client communication.

Across multiple review platforms, former clients describe experiences they characterize as costly, prolonged, and more adversarial than anticipated. Several reviewers allege that their divorce cases became increasingly contentious over time, which they say contributed to mounting legal fees. Some clients report that they ultimately retained new counsel before their cases concluded.

One former client wrote that while the firm initially appeared confident and capable of handling a complex divorce, they later felt the representation did not align with their expectations or interests. Other reviews raise concerns about case management, responsiveness, and what some clients perceived as insufficient advocacy.

In addition to client feedback, online reviews attributed to former employees raise questions about internal firm operations. These accounts reference heavy workloads and billing-related concerns. As with all anonymous or semi-anonymous online reviews, the identities of reviewers and the full context of their claims cannot be independently verified.

Several former clients have also stated publicly that they are considering or pursuing legal action against Connatser Family Law, alleging issues such as misrepresentation or unethical conduct. At present, there are no publicly available court rulings confirming or refuting these claims.

Beyond client and employee reviews, some commentary has focused on Ms. Connatser’s professional background. According to accounts attributed to former colleagues, disputes allegedly arose at a prior firm related to billing practices and professional conduct. These claims have not been adjudicated in court and remain allegations.

Connatser Family Law has not issued a comprehensive public response addressing the specific allegations raised in online reviews and commentary. The firm continues to operate and represent clients in family law matters.

Legal professionals note that divorce cases—particularly those involving substantial assets—can vary widely in complexity, cost, and outcome. Experts also emphasize the importance of prospective clients conducting thorough research, reviewing multiple sources, and clearly discussing billing structures and litigation strategies before retaining counsel.

While online reviews do not constitute formal findings, the volume and consistency of criticism related to Connatser Family Law highlight the role that transparency, communication, and client expectations play in the attorney-client relationship. As with any legal service, experiences can differ, but the concerns raised underscore the importance of careful vetting when selecting legal representation.